Gringo Lost

Words about things and stuff

There’s no such thing as “funemployment”

with 2 comments

Hey, I’m gainfully employed. So now I can blog again. These are exciting times.

Since I’m employed and blogging again, maybe I should comment first on the state of national unemployment:

103,000 jobs were created in December. Which lowered the unemployment rate to 9.4%. The lowest it has been in 19 months. Good news? Ehh, not really.

For one, after worker productivity gains and the natural growth of the labor force (think December graduation and less retirees), 103,000 more jobs ain’t that many.

My general observations – which aren’t unique – are the labor market has undergone a permanent change. Structural unemployment is likely to be this high for a long time because employers learned to be leaner since the Great Recession. Secondly, those who are working have become more willing to work longer hours because unemployment can come quickly and seemingly last for eternity (trust me). And really, there is no such thing as funemployment.

What can government do about this? Not sure if many will like my answer. Maybe legislators can take a look at worker rights issues. Maybe Congress can limit work-week hours for salaried employees.

Everyone knows that income inequality is increasing in the U.S.  Now, I’m not saying that this is because many high-wage earners are lucky or benefit unfairly. Most high-paying occupations are given to highly skilled employees who earn their salaries by taking on significant workloads, often 2 – 3 times more than a typical job. So what if Congress were to pass or consider legislation which – *now I’m about to curse – like the French-system imposed limitations on hours-per-week an employer can have their employees work?

I’m not saying let’s have 35 hour work weeks. But what if work-weeks were not allowed to surpass 50 hours, or 55 hours? I know employers who would lose 20 hours of per employee work this way. Now if they had 2 employees who couldn’t work 20 extra hours a week, they would have to hire another employee. Pay may decrease per employee but employment would increase. General social benefit would occur.


Written by gringolost

January 8, 2011 at 12:01 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

Tagged with

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Welcome back.



    January 9, 2011 at 11:44 am

  2. I loved up to you’ll obtain performed right here. The caricature is attractive, your authored material stylish. neheltveress, you command get bought an edginess over that you wish be turning in the following. sick certainly come more beforehand again as exactly the same nearly a lot continuously within case you shield this increase.


    May 23, 2017 at 8:44 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: